Establishing a basis for recognising marine ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’ (OECMs) in South Africa

Systematic Review

Establishing a basis for recognising marine ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’ (OECMs) in South Africa

Published in: African Journal of Marine Science
Volume 47 , issue 3 , 2025 , pages: 219–242
DOI: 10.2989/1814232X.2025.2552997
Author(s): SP Kirkman Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE), South Africa , P Kowalski , South Africa , SD Holness Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, South Africa , LJ Atkinson , South Africa , R Brand Western Cape Government, South Africa , L Dunga Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, South Africa , TP Fairweather Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE), South Africa , T Goldman Rhodes University, South Africa , D Marnewick Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office, South Africa , J Nhleko Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE), South Africa , R Peter Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE), South Africa , C Smith World Wide Fund for Nature – South Africa (WWF-SA), South Africa , MG van der Bank South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Kirstenbosch Research Centre, South Africa , G van der Heever Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE), South Africa , L van Niekerk Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, South Africa , KA Wright Wildlands Conservation Trust (WILDTRUST), South Africa , KJ Sink Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, South Africa

Abstract

The concept of ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’ (OECMs) and its technical guidance provide opportunities for recognising a broader range of area-based management measures that contribute to biodiversity conservation outside of protected areas. However, progress towards the recognition of OECMs for the marine environment is less advanced than for terrestrial processes. In response, South Africa developed a systematic approach to establish coherence on the OECM concept in the marine, coastal and estuarine context through rapid trial assessments of 14 management measures against six simplified OECM criteria. The objectives included identifying measures with the greatest potential as OECMs, identifying information gaps and highlighting issues that are unique to the marine context, framed within the OECM definition and assessment criteria. Among the assessed measures, only two (both restricted areas for fishing) were considered unsuitable overall owing to being short-term measures, and in one case because of its single-species focus and weak contribution to broader biodiversity outcomes. Other measures varied in their suitability, with ‘biosphere reserve marine buffer zone’ and ‘closed fishing areas adjacent to African penguin colonies’ being among the existing measures that show the most potential, aligning with five and four of the six simplified criteria for OECMs, respectively. There is substantial work needed to advance marine OECMs in South Africa and to negotiate complexities brought about by the overlapping nature of jurisdictions, management measures, rights and stakeholder interests in the marine realm, and the need for equitable and effective marine governance and management. The approach and recommendations from this exercise may be useful to other countries undertaking similar efforts.

Get new issue alerts for African Journal of Marine Science