The state of costing research for HIV interventions in sub-Saharan Africa

Article

The state of costing research for HIV interventions in sub-Saharan Africa

DOI: 10.2989/16085906.2019.1679200
Author(s): Drew B Cameron Health Policy and Management, USA , Mohamed Mustafa Diab Institute for Health Policy Studies, USA , Lauren N Carroll Institute for Health Policy Studies, USA , Lori A Bollinger Avenir Health, USA , Willyanne DeCormier Plosky Avenir Health, USA , Carol Levin Department of Global Health, USA , Benjamin Herzel Institute for Health Policy Studies, USA , Elliot Marseille Health Strategies International, USA , Lily Alexander Department of Global Health, USA , Sergio Bautista-Arredondo Division of Health Economics and Health Systems Innovations, Mexico , Carlos Pineda-Antunez Division of Health Economics and Health Systems Innovations, Mexico , Diego Cerecero-García Division of Health Economics and Health Systems Innovations, Mexico , Gabriela B Gomez London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom , William H Dow Health Policy and Management, USA , James G Kahn Institute for Health Policy Studies, USA

Abstract

The past decade has seen a growing emphasis on the production of high-quality costing data to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of global health interventions. The need for such data is especially important for decision making and priority setting across HIV services from prevention and testing to treatment and care. To help address this critical need, the Global Health Cost Consortium was created in 2016, in part to conduct a systematic search and screening of the costing literature for HIV and TB interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The purpose of this portion of the remit was to compile, standardise, and make publicly available published cost data (peer-reviewed and gray) for public use. We limit our analysis to a review of the quantity and characteristics of published cost data from HIV interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. First, we document the production of cost data over 25 years, including density over time, geography, publication venue, authorship and type of intervention. Second, we explore key methods and reporting for characteristics including urbanicity, platform type, ownership and scale. Although the volume of HIV costing data has increased substantially on the continent, cost reporting is lacking across several dimensions. We find a dearth of cost estimates from HIV interventions in west Africa, as well as inconsistent reporting of key dimensions of cost including platform type, ownership and urbanicity. Further, we find clear evidence of a need for renewed focus on the consistent reporting of scale by authors of costing and cost-effectiveness analyses.

Get new issue alerts for African Journal of AIDS Research