Article

Efficacy of intrathecal midazolam versus fentanyl for endoscopic urology surgery

Published in: Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia
Volume 21 , issue 2 , 2015 , pages: 31–34

DOI: 10.1080/22201181.2015.1028216

Author(s): Neerja Bharti Department of Anesthesia & Intensive Care, India , Yatindra K Batra Department of Anesthesia & Intensive Care, India , Sunder L Negi Department of Anesthesia & Intensive Care, India

Keywords: adverse effects , adjuvants-fentanyl; midazolam , anesthesia-spinal , endoscopic urology surgery , postoperative analgesia

Download full text Get new issue alerts

Abstract

Background: This prospective randomized double-blind study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of intrathecal midazolam versus fentanyl as an adjunct to bupivacaine for endoscopic urology surgery.

« Comparison of dexmedetomidine, pethidine and tramadol in the treatment of post-neuraxial anaesthesia shivering

Successful difficult airway intubation using the Miller laryngoscope blade and paraglossal technique »