Radicals versus Moderates: A Critique of Gyekye’s Moderate Communitarianism

Original Articles

Radicals versus Moderates: A Critique of Gyekye’s Moderate Communitarianism

Published in: South African Journal of Philosophy
Volume 28 , issue 2 , 2009 , pages: 160–170
DOI: 10.4314/sajpem.v28i2.46674
Author(s): Bernard Matolino School of Philosophy and Ethics University of KwaZulu-Natal Private Bag X01 Scottsville, South Africa

Abstract

The communitarian conception of person is a widely accepted view in African thought. Kwame Gyekye thinks there is a distinction between what he calls radical communitarianism and his own version of moderate communitarianism. He is of the view that radical communitarianism is faced with insurmountable problems and ought to be jettisoned in favour of his moderate communitarianism. Gyekye’s strategy is twofold; he firstly seeks to show the shortcomings of radical communitarianism - particularly by attacking Ifeanyi Menkiti’s position. Secondly, he seeks to show the authenticity of his version as well as its serious regard for individual rights as representing a triumph over radical communitarianism. In this paper, I seek to contest both of Gyekye’s strategies.

Get new issue alerts for South African Journal of Philosophy