Selection and evaluation of promising indigenous fodder trees and shrubs as supplemental diets for ruminant animals across different agroecological environments

Research Article

Selection and evaluation of promising indigenous fodder trees and shrubs as supplemental diets for ruminant animals across different agroecological environments

DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2023.2228840
Author(s): Shigdaf Mekuriaw Amhara Region Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia , Atsushi Tsunekawa Tottori University, Japan , Toshiyoshi Ichinohe Shimane University Faculty of Life and Environmental Science, , Firew Tegegne Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia , Nigussie Haregeweyn Tottori University, Japan , Nobuyuki Kobayashi Tottori University, Japan , Assaminew Tassew Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia , Yeshambel Mekuriaw Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia , Misganaw Walie Belete Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia , Seid Ali Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia , Mitsuru Tsubo Tottori University, Japan , Toshiya Okuro The University of Tokyo, Japan , Derege Meshesha Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia , Getu Abebe Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia

Abstract

The aim of this study was to select and evaluate promising potential indigenous fodder trees and shrubs (IFTS) as supplemental feeds for ruminant animals. Through interviews with farmers and field inventories, 107 IFTS species were identified as ruminant feeds, from which 37 potential IFTS species were selected. The chemical composition and anti-nutritional factors of the selected IFTS were analysed. Among the 37 selected IFTS species, crude protein (CP) ranged from 83.3 to 230.5 (mean, 134.3) g kg−1 dry matter (DM); CP was greater than 80 g kg−1 DM in all selected species. Condensed tannin (CT) content varied from 2.57 to 210.91 g kg−1 (p < 0.05) among the selected species, of which 72% had < 40 g kg−1 DM, an amount that is tolerable for ruminants. Farmers’ preferences and the nutritive value of the selected fodder species were positively correlated (p < 0.05) for CP (0.61), organic matter digestibility (0.303) and metabolisable energy (0.25). Farmers’ preference ranking and the nutritive value of the plants were considered to select the top 14 IFTS, all of which had CP > 110 g kg−1, neutral detergent fibre (NDF) < 350 g kg−1, and CT < 40 g kg−1. Thus, the selected potential IFTS need further evaluation for their agronomic practice, biomass production and animal performance.

Get new issue alerts for African Journal of Range & Forage Science